20% of captured citations point to brand-owned domains, so AI still leans on anhoriga.se before it trusts Ågrenska directly.
Owned citations
20%
Site readiness
48/100
Trust signals
3/6
Top external source
anhoriga.se
1 citations captured
How AI answers the prompts that shape buying decisions in this category.
Ågrenska is missing from this prompt.
Nanny.nu and Habilitering & Hälsa take the recommendation while Ågrenska stays out of the answer.
Ågrenska appears, but doesn’t own the answer.
Ågrenska appears, but the proof still comes from competitor framing and third-party sources.
Ågrenska appears, but doesn’t own the answer.
Ågrenska appears, but the proof still comes from competitor framing and third-party sources.
20% of citations come from agrenska.se. The rest shape the answer without your input.
What AI checks before recommending a brand.
4 of 5 answers
1 of 5 from agrenska.se
Crawl signals open
Gap: Wikipedia
Blockers
The shortest path to stronger recommendation share.
Give AI a page worth citing
1/5 captured citations came from agrenska.se. Right now AI still leans on anhoriga.se for category proof.
Create pages AI can remember
Ågrenska is not yet stable AI memory. Add comparison pages, clear category explainers, and reusable trust assets that models can come back to.
Add explicit crawler guidance
Right now there is no explicit retrieval guidance for AI crawlers. Add llms.txt plus clearer category and product paths that models can trust and revisit.
The brand is visible. The opportunity is owning the proof layer.