Across the prompts tested in this run, AI is leaning on peoplemanagingpeople.com and other intermediaries instead of Avature.
Owned citations
0%
Site readiness
68/100
Trust signals
4/6
Top external source
peoplemanagingpeople.com
2 citations captured
How AI answers the prompts that shape buying decisions in this category.
Avature is missing from this prompt.
Lever and Greenhouse take the recommendation while Avature stays out of the answer.
Avature is missing from this prompt.
Greenhouse and Workable take the recommendation while Avature stays out of the answer.
Avature appears, but doesn’t own the answer.
Avature appears, but the proof still comes from competitor framing and third-party sources.
0% of citations come from avature.net. The rest shape the answer without your input.
What AI checks before recommending a brand.
2 of 5 answers
0 of 5 from avature.net
Crawl signals open
Gap: Wikipedia
The shortest path to stronger recommendation share.
Give AI a page worth citing
0/5 captured citations came from avature.net. Right now AI still leans on peoplemanagingpeople.com for category proof.
Create pages AI can remember
Avature is not yet stable AI memory. Add comparison pages, clear category explainers, and reusable trust assets that models can come back to.
Make the site easier to trust
The current site-readiness score is 68. Tighten schema, answer formatting, and crawl clarity so AI systems can trust owned pages faster.
The brand is missing from the answer set.