Across the prompts tested in this run, AI is leaning on massageenvy.com and other intermediaries instead of HARA Centar.
Owned citations
0%
Site readiness
39/100
Trust signals
0/6
Top external source
massageenvy.com
2 citations captured
How AI answers the prompts that shape buying decisions in this category.
HARA Centar is missing from this prompt.
Massage Envy and Hand & Stone take the recommendation while HARA Centar stays out of the answer.
HARA Centar is missing from this prompt.
AI answers this query without a strong brand frame, so HARA Centar never becomes the obvious choice.
HARA Centar is missing from this prompt.
Massage Envy and Hand & Stone take the recommendation while HARA Centar stays out of the answer.
0% of citations come from centar-hara.hr. The rest shape the answer without your input.
What AI checks before recommending a brand.
0 of 2 answers
0 of 2 from centar-hara.hr
Crawl signals open
Gap: Web mentions
Blockers
The shortest path to stronger recommendation share.
Give AI a page worth citing
0/2 captured citations came from centar-hara.hr. Right now AI still leans on massageenvy.com for category proof.
Create pages AI can remember
HARA Centar is not yet stable AI memory. Add comparison pages, clear category explainers, and reusable trust assets that models can come back to.
Add explicit crawler guidance
Right now there is no explicit retrieval guidance for AI crawlers. Add llms.txt plus clearer category and product paths that models can trust and revisit.
The brand is missing from the answer set.