Disability Rights North Carolina is showing up, but AI still borrows authority from the open web.
33% of captured citations point to brand-owned domains, so AI still leans on ecac-parentcenter.org before it trusts Disability Rights North Carolina directly.
Owned citations
33%
Site readiness
71/100
Trust signals
4/6
Visibility Share %
DITop external source
ecac-parentcenter.org
1 citations captured
Buyer prompt analysis
How AI answers the prompts that shape buying decisions in this category.
Disability Rights North Carolina appears, but doesn’t own the answer.
Disability Rights North Carolina appears, but the proof still comes from competitor framing and third-party sources.
Disability Rights North Carolina appears, but doesn’t own the answer.
Disability Rights North Carolina appears, but the proof still comes from competitor framing and third-party sources.
Disability Rights North Carolina appears, but doesn’t own the answer.
Disability Rights North Carolina appears, but the proof still comes from competitor framing and third-party sources.
Where AI gets its proof
33% of citations come from disabilityrightsnc.org. The rest shape the answer without your input.
Authority signals
What AI checks before recommending a brand.
6 of 6 answers
2 of 6 from disabilityrightsnc.org
Crawl signals open
Gap: Wikipedia
Blockers
What to fix first
The shortest path to stronger recommendation share.
Give AI a page worth citing
2/6 captured citations came from disabilityrightsnc.org. Right now AI still leans on ecac-parentcenter.org for category proof.
Create pages AI can remember
Disability Rights North Carolina is not yet stable AI memory. Add comparison pages, clear category explainers, and reusable trust assets that models can come back to.
Add explicit crawler guidance
Right now there is no explicit retrieval guidance for AI crawlers. Add llms.txt plus clearer category and product paths that models can trust and revisit.
The brand is visible. The opportunity is owning the proof layer.