Figma is showing up, but AI still borrows authority from the open web.
0% of captured citations point to brand-owned domains, so AI still leans on zapier.com before it trusts Figma directly.
Owned citations
0%
Site readiness
61/100
Trust signals
6/6
Visibility Share %
FI
PRTop external source
zapier.com
1 citations captured
Buyer prompt analysis
How AI answers the prompts that shape buying decisions in this category.
Figma appears, but doesn’t own the answer.
Figma appears, but the proof still comes from competitor framing and third-party sources.
Figma appears, but doesn’t own the answer.
Figma appears, but the proof still comes from competitor framing and third-party sources.
Figma appears, but doesn’t own the answer.
Figma appears, but the proof still comes from competitor framing and third-party sources.
Where AI gets its proof
0% of citations come from figma.com. The rest shape the answer without your input.
Authority signals
What AI checks before recommending a brand.
4 of 4 answers
0 of 4 from figma.com
3 crawlers restricted
Core signals present
Blockers
What to fix first
The shortest path to stronger recommendation share.
Give AI a page worth citing
0/4 captured citations came from figma.com. Right now AI still leans on zapier.com for category proof.
Create pages AI can remember
Figma is not yet stable AI memory. Add comparison pages, clear category explainers, and reusable trust assets that models can come back to.
Add explicit crawler guidance
Right now there is no explicit retrieval guidance for AI crawlers. Add llms.txt plus clearer category and product paths that models can trust and revisit.
The brand is visible. The opportunity is owning the proof layer.