Fiverr is already getting recommended in the tested prompts.
The commercial gap is now proof ownership. AI can see the brand, but it still needs more reasons to cite Fiverr directly.
Owned citations
0%
Site readiness
64/100
Trust signals
6/6
Visibility Share %
FR
FITop external source
upwork.com
3 citations captured
Buyer prompt analysis
How AI answers the prompts that shape buying decisions in this category.
Fiverr is missing from this prompt.
Upwork and Freelancer.com take the recommendation while Fiverr stays out of the answer.
Fiverr appears, but doesn’t own the answer.
Fiverr appears, but the proof still comes from competitor framing and third-party sources.
Fiverr appears, but doesn’t own the answer.
Fiverr appears, but the proof still comes from competitor framing and third-party sources.
Where AI gets its proof
0% of citations come from fiverr.com. The rest shape the answer without your input.
Authority signals
What AI checks before recommending a brand.
6 of 7 answers
0 of 6 from fiverr.com
Crawl signals open
Core signals present
Blockers
What to fix first
The shortest path to stronger recommendation share.
Give AI a page worth citing
0/6 captured citations came from fiverr.com. Right now AI still leans on upwork.com for category proof.
Add explicit crawler guidance
Right now there is no explicit retrieval guidance for AI crawlers. Add llms.txt plus clearer category and product paths that models can trust and revisit.
Make the site easier to trust
The current site-readiness score is 64. Tighten schema, answer formatting, and crawl clarity so AI systems can trust owned pages faster.
The brand is visible. The opportunity is owning the proof layer.