Fust is showing up, but AI still borrows authority from the open web.
43% of captured citations point to brand-owned domains, so AI still leans on de.wikipedia.org before it trusts Fust directly.
Owned citations
43%
Site readiness
67/100
Trust signals
4/6
Visibility Share %
FU
BRTop external source
de.wikipedia.org
1 citations captured
Buyer prompt analysis
How AI answers the prompts that shape buying decisions in this category.
Fust appears, but doesn’t own the answer.
Fust is in the answer, but it still shares the shortlist with strong competitor cues.
Fust appears, but doesn’t own the answer.
Fust is in the answer, but it still shares the shortlist with strong competitor cues.
Fust appears, but doesn’t own the answer.
Fust is present, but the answer still relies on thin or indirect proof.
Where AI gets its proof
43% of citations come from fust.ch. The rest shape the answer without your input.
Authority signals
What AI checks before recommending a brand.
7 of 7 answers
3 of 7 from fust.ch
1 crawlers restricted
Gap: Wikipedia
Blockers
What to fix first
The shortest path to stronger recommendation share.
Create pages AI can remember
Fust is not yet stable AI memory. Add comparison pages, clear category explainers, and reusable trust assets that models can come back to.
Add explicit crawler guidance
Right now there is no explicit retrieval guidance for AI crawlers. Add llms.txt plus clearer category and product paths that models can trust and revisit.
Make the site easier to trust
The current site-readiness score is 67. Tighten schema, answer formatting, and crawl clarity so AI systems can trust owned pages faster.
The brand is visible. The opportunity is owning the proof layer.