Across the prompts tested in this run, AI is leaning on visionexpress.pl and other intermediaries instead of GeniusEyes.
Owned citations
25%
Site readiness
65/100
Trust signals
2/6
Top external source
visionexpress.pl
1 citations captured
How AI answers the prompts that shape buying decisions in this category.
GeniusEyes is missing from this prompt.
Vision Express and Fabryka Optyka take the recommendation while GeniusEyes stays out of the answer.
GeniusEyes is missing from this prompt.
Promyk Słońca and Centrum Balans take the recommendation while GeniusEyes stays out of the answer.
GeniusEyes appears, but doesn’t own the answer.
GeniusEyes appears, but the proof still comes from competitor framing and third-party sources.
25% of citations come from geniuseyes.pl. The rest shape the answer without your input.
What AI checks before recommending a brand.
2 of 5 answers
1 of 4 from geniuseyes.pl
Crawl signals open
Gap: Wikipedia
Blockers
The shortest path to stronger recommendation share.
Give AI a page worth citing
1/4 captured citations came from geniuseyes.pl. Right now AI still leans on visionexpress.pl for category proof.
Create pages AI can remember
GeniusEyes is not yet stable AI memory. Add comparison pages, clear category explainers, and reusable trust assets that models can come back to.
Add explicit crawler guidance
Right now there is no explicit retrieval guidance for AI crawlers. Add llms.txt plus clearer category and product paths that models can trust and revisit.
The brand is missing from the answer set.