木里木外 is not being recommended in this tested buying-moment cluster.
Across the prompts tested in this run, AI is leaning on demo.isabe.org and other intermediaries instead of 木里木外.
Owned citations
0%
Site readiness
30/100
Trust signals
2/6
Visibility Share %
木里Top external source
demo.isabe.org
1 citations captured
Buyer prompt analysis
How AI answers the prompts that shape buying decisions in this category.
木里木外 is missing from this prompt.
AI answers this query without a strong brand frame, so 木里木外 never becomes the obvious choice.
木里木外 is missing from this prompt.
AI answers this query without a strong brand frame, so 木里木外 never becomes the obvious choice.
木里木外 is missing from this prompt.
AI answers this query without a strong brand frame, so 木里木外 never becomes the obvious choice.
Where AI gets its proof
0% of citations come from muli.group. The rest shape the answer without your input.
Authority signals
What AI checks before recommending a brand.
0 of 6 answers
0 of 2 from muli.group
Crawl signals open
Gap: Wikipedia
Blockers
What to fix first
The shortest path to stronger recommendation share.
Give AI a page worth citing
0/2 captured citations came from muli.group. Right now AI still leans on demo.isabe.org for category proof.
Create pages AI can remember
木里木外 is not yet stable AI memory. Add comparison pages, clear category explainers, and reusable trust assets that models can come back to.
Add explicit crawler guidance
Right now there is no explicit retrieval guidance for AI crawlers. Add llms.txt plus clearer category and product paths that models can trust and revisit.
The brand is missing from the answer set.