Saatva is showing up, but AI still borrows authority from the open web.
0% of captured citations point to brand-owned domains, so AI still leans on tomsguide.com before it trusts Saatva directly.
Owned citations
0%
Site readiness
57/100
Trust signals
1/6
Visibility Share %
SATop external source
tomsguide.com
2 citations captured
Buyer prompt analysis
How AI answers the prompts that shape buying decisions in this category.
Saatva is missing from this prompt.
AI answers this query without a strong brand frame, so Saatva never becomes the obvious choice.
Saatva appears, but doesn’t own the answer.
Saatva appears, but the proof still comes from competitor framing and third-party sources.
Saatva appears, but doesn’t own the answer.
Saatva appears, but the proof still comes from competitor framing and third-party sources.
Where AI gets its proof
0% of citations come from saatva.com. The rest shape the answer without your input.
Authority signals
What AI checks before recommending a brand.
3 of 3 answers
0 of 3 from saatva.com
Crawl signals open
Gap: Web mentions
Blockers
What to fix first
The shortest path to stronger recommendation share.
Give AI a page worth citing
0/3 captured citations came from saatva.com. Right now AI still leans on tomsguide.com for category proof.
Create pages AI can remember
Saatva is not yet stable AI memory. Add comparison pages, clear category explainers, and reusable trust assets that models can come back to.
Add explicit crawler guidance
Right now there is no explicit retrieval guidance for AI crawlers. Add llms.txt plus clearer category and product paths that models can trust and revisit.
The brand is visible. The opportunity is owning the proof layer.