Socialstyrelsen is not being recommended in this tested buying-moment cluster.
Across the prompts tested in this run, AI is leaning on ltcnews.com and other intermediaries instead of Socialstyrelsen.
Owned citations
0%
Site readiness
56/100
Trust signals
5/6
Visibility Share %
SOTop external source
ltcnews.com
1 citations captured
Buyer prompt analysis
How AI answers the prompts that shape buying decisions in this category.
Socialstyrelsen is missing from this prompt.
AI answers this query without a strong brand frame, so Socialstyrelsen never becomes the obvious choice.
Socialstyrelsen is missing from this prompt.
AI answers this query without a strong brand frame, so Socialstyrelsen never becomes the obvious choice.
Socialstyrelsen is missing from this prompt.
AI answers this query without a strong brand frame, so Socialstyrelsen never becomes the obvious choice.
Where AI gets its proof
0% of citations come from socialstyrelsen.se. The rest shape the answer without your input.
Authority signals
What AI checks before recommending a brand.
0 of 5 answers
0 of 3 from socialstyrelsen.se
Crawl signals open
Gap: Wikipedia
Blockers
What to fix first
The shortest path to stronger recommendation share.
Give AI a page worth citing
0/3 captured citations came from socialstyrelsen.se. Right now AI still leans on ltcnews.com for category proof.
Create pages AI can remember
Socialstyrelsen is not yet stable AI memory. Add comparison pages, clear category explainers, and reusable trust assets that models can come back to.
Add explicit crawler guidance
Right now there is no explicit retrieval guidance for AI crawlers. Add llms.txt plus clearer category and product paths that models can trust and revisit.
The brand is missing from the answer set.