Suitsupply appears in the tested prompts, but it is not yet the obvious recommendation.
Suitsupply shows up in some buying moments, but AI still trusts wedding.alibaba.com and competitor framing too often.
Owned citations
0%
Site readiness
54/100
Trust signals
1/6
Visibility Share %
SUTop external source
wedding.alibaba.com
1 citations captured
Buyer prompt analysis
How AI answers the prompts that shape buying decisions in this category.
Suitsupply is missing from this prompt.
J.Crew and Brooks Brothers take the recommendation while Suitsupply stays out of the answer.
Suitsupply appears, but doesn’t own the answer.
Suitsupply appears, but the proof still comes from competitor framing and third-party sources.
Suitsupply appears, but doesn’t own the answer.
Suitsupply appears, but the proof still comes from competitor framing and third-party sources.
Where AI gets its proof
0% of citations come from suitsupply.com. The rest shape the answer without your input.
Authority signals
What AI checks before recommending a brand.
3 of 5 answers
0 of 4 from suitsupply.com
Crawl signals open
Gap: Web mentions
Blockers
What to fix first
The shortest path to stronger recommendation share.
Give AI a page worth citing
0/4 captured citations came from suitsupply.com. Right now AI still leans on wedding.alibaba.com for category proof.
Create pages AI can remember
Suitsupply is not yet stable AI memory. Add comparison pages, clear category explainers, and reusable trust assets that models can come back to.
Add explicit crawler guidance
Right now there is no explicit retrieval guidance for AI crawlers. Add llms.txt plus clearer category and product paths that models can trust and revisit.
The brand is in the consideration set, but not yet the default pick.