T&C Logistics is not being recommended in this tested buying-moment cluster.
Across the prompts tested in this run, AI is leaning on en.wikipedia.org and other intermediaries instead of T&C Logistics.
Owned citations
0%
Site readiness
78/100
Trust signals
1/6
Visibility Share %
Top external source
en.wikipedia.org
1 citations captured
Buyer prompt analysis
How AI answers the prompts that shape buying decisions in this category.
T&C Logistics is missing from this prompt.
World Courier and GEODIS take the recommendation while T&C Logistics stays out of the answer.
T&C Logistics is missing from this prompt.
UPS and FedEx take the recommendation while T&C Logistics stays out of the answer.
T&C Logistics is missing from this prompt.
UPS and FedEx take the recommendation while T&C Logistics stays out of the answer.
Where AI gets its proof
0% of citations come from tclogistics.uk. The rest shape the answer without your input.
Authority signals
What AI checks before recommending a brand.
0 of 4 answers
0 of 4 from tclogistics.uk
Crawl signals open
Gap: Web mentions
Blockers
What to fix first
The shortest path to stronger recommendation share.
Give AI a page worth citing
0/4 captured citations came from tclogistics.uk. Right now AI still leans on en.wikipedia.org for category proof.
Create pages AI can remember
T&C Logistics is not yet stable AI memory. Add comparison pages, clear category explainers, and reusable trust assets that models can come back to.
Close the gap against DHL Express
DHL Express appears in 2/4 tested prompt clusters. Build comparison and decision-support pages exactly where AI keeps pairing the brands.
The brand is missing from the answer set.