Across the prompts tested in this run, AI is leaning on support.google.com and other intermediaries instead of Uproas.
Owned citations
14%
Site readiness
66/100
Trust signals
1/6
Top external source
support.google.com
2 citations captured
How AI answers the prompts that shape buying decisions in this category.
Uproas is missing from this prompt.
Otyss Marketing take the recommendation while Uproas stays out of the answer.
Uproas is missing from this prompt.
AI answers this query without a strong brand frame, so Uproas never becomes the obvious choice.
Uproas appears, but doesn’t own the answer.
Uproas appears, but the proof still comes from competitor framing and third-party sources.
14% of citations come from uproas.io. The rest shape the answer without your input.
What AI checks before recommending a brand.
2 of 7 answers
1 of 7 from uproas.io
Crawl signals open
Gap: Web mentions
Blockers
The shortest path to stronger recommendation share.
Give AI a page worth citing
1/7 captured citations came from uproas.io. Right now AI still leans on support.google.com for category proof.
Create pages AI can remember
Uproas is not yet stable AI memory. Add comparison pages, clear category explainers, and reusable trust assets that models can come back to.
Add explicit crawler guidance
Right now there is no explicit retrieval guidance for AI crawlers. Add llms.txt plus clearer category and product paths that models can trust and revisit.
The brand is missing from the answer set.