85.5% of companies are classified as "emerging" with an average AI visibility score of 1.6. The top 5.2% are "leaders" averaging 93.4. There is no middle class. I named this the 85-5 rule after pulling competitive position data from 2,014 brand reports. AI recommendations follow a power law.
Want to see where your company falls? Run a free report at loamly.ai/check.
The Distribution: No Middle Class
Across 2,014 completed brand reports (as of Feb 15, 2026), here is how companies are classified by competitive position:
| Position | Companies | % | Avg AI Visibility |
|---|---|---|---|
| Emerging | 1,721 | 85.5% | 1.6 |
| Niche | 100 | 5.0% | 36.8 |
| Challenger | 51 | 2.5% | 60.5 |
| Leader | 104 | 5.2% | 93.4 |
The gap between "emerging" and "leader" is 58x. Not a gradient. A cliff.
Only 7.7% of companies sit in the niche or challenger range. The distribution is bimodal: you are either at the bottom or at the top. The middle barely exists.
The Score Distribution Confirms It
The visibility score distribution tells the same story from a different angle:
| Score Tier | Companies | % |
|---|---|---|
| 0-20 (Invisible) | 1,726 | 85.7% |
| 21-40 (Low) | 115 | 5.7% |
| 41-60 (Moderate) | 46 | 2.3% |
| 61-80 (Good) | 41 | 2.0% |
| 81-100 (Excellent) | 86 | 4.3% |
85.7% score 0-20. Only 4.3% score above 80. The middle tiers (21-80) contain just 202 companies out of 2,014. That is 10%.
When someone asks ChatGPT "best CRM for startups," the model recommends from a small pool. Our data shows that pool is roughly the top 15%. The other 85% are not in the consideration set.
Why AI Creates Winner-Take-All Dynamics
Traditional search distributes attention across 10 blue links. Position 1 gets more clicks than position 10, but position 10 still exists. AI search is different.
When ChatGPT answers "best project management tool," it mentions 3-5 options. Not 10. Not 50. The top 3-5. Everyone else is invisible.
This creates a feedback loop:
- AI recommends the most-mentioned brands
- Users visit and validate those brands
- More web content (reviews, comparisons) references those brands
- AI training data reinforces the same brands
- Next recommendation cycle, the same brands appear again
The rich get richer. The invisible stay invisible.
What Separates Leaders From Emerging
I looked at what leaders have that emerging companies don't:
| Factor | Leaders (104 companies) | Emerging (1,721 companies) |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Brand Authority | 90.9+ | ~15 |
| Wikipedia presence | ~90% | ~2% |
| 50+ Reddit mentions | ~85% | ~10% |
| YouTube presence | ~95% | ~40% |
| Avg GEO Score | ~65 | ~50 |
GEO scores are not the differentiator. Leaders average ~65 GEO, emerging companies average ~50. That is a 30% difference. Brand authority differs by 6x. Wikipedia presence differs by 45x.
The path from emerging to leader is not about optimizing your website. It is about building brand authority through off-site presence: Wikipedia, Reddit, industry press, thought leadership, awards.
The Dark AI Traffic Angle
Even companies in the leader tier have a measurement problem.
Across 446,405 visits in our database, 14,413 arrived from AI platforms with no referrer headers. GA4 classifies all of them as "Direct." Dark AI traffic converts at 10.21% transactional rate vs 2.46% for non-AI traffic.
Leaders get recommended by AI. Recommendations generate traffic. But 80%+ of that traffic is invisible to standard analytics. So even leaders don't know how much AI traffic they actually receive.
If you are in the 85.5%, the question is not "how do I optimize." The question is "how do I build the brand authority to enter the consideration set." And once you do, you need detection tools that can see the traffic that results.
Methodology
Data source: 2,014 Loamly brand reports (completed as of Feb 15, 2026).
Competitive position: Derived from AI visibility score, brand authority, and citation rates across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity. Each report runs 48 queries across all four platforms.
Limitation: Companies that run the check tool may skew toward those already interested in AI visibility. The sample is not random. However, the bimodal distribution (85.5% emerging vs 5.2% leaders) is consistent across every industry segment in the dataset.
Next Steps
- Run a free report: loamly.ai/check. See if you are in the 85.5% or the 5.2%.
- Read the benchmark: 2,014 companies, 85.7% invisible
- Understand the levers: Brand Authority Is 26x More Important Than Technical SEO
- Detect your AI traffic: How to Track AI Traffic in 2026
No marketing spin. Just real data about your AI visibility.
Last updated: February 7, 2026
Stay Updated on AI Visibility
Get weekly insights on GEO, AI traffic trends, and how to optimize for AI search engines.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Related Articles
The Agent Economy Is Here. Your Brand Is Probably Invisible In It
85.7% of 2,014 companies score near zero on AI visibility. AI agents spend money autonomously. Same discovery layer that powers ChatGPT today.
AI Sentiment Amplification: Why 'Very Positive' Gets 8x More Visibility
'Very positive' companies average 44.7 AI visibility vs 5.4 for 'positive.' AI models amplify already strong sentiment.
Check Your AI Visibility
See what ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity say about your brand. Free, no signup.
Get Free Report